Tutorial Home Page
Definition
Distance vs Distributed
Trends and Issues
Cornell Examples
Role of the Library
Cornell Partners
References

 

 

 

CUL Gateway
CUL Staff Web
CU Home

ODL Home Page

 

 

 


 

What are the key trends and issues in distributed learning?

Over the last few years, the size and importance of the distributed learning
market have grown steadily. Many universities and colleges have identified
distributed learning as a top priority and a strategic development area. The
Peterson's Web site lists almost 1000 institutions in Canada and the US,
which offer some form of distance learning course. In 2000, an estimated
three million students took online courses, up from 1.6 million in 1998.
According to a recent International Data Corporation study, e-learning
will become a $5.5 billion industry in North America by 2002.

Pros of Distributed Learning

Integrating information technologies into teaching has great potential to
enhance the learning environment. The focus is on how students learn,
rather than on teaching. This new approach creates an opportunity to
examine and enhance teaching methods. The model supports the
needs of nontraditional students and encourages life-long
learning. Education transcends time and space barriers, and
takes place at a pace set by the students themselves.

Some studies have concluded that distributed learning can be a quality
service if professors use new approaches and try to make the learning
experience interactive. However, small-group, interactive courses are
expensive and time-consuming to produce.

Cons of Distributed Learning

Although distributed learning has many virtues, it also has critics who warn
the teaching community of its potential threats. Some fear that commercial,
rather than pedagogical, considerations are driving the distance-learning
trend in certain universities. Some argue that the movement is
spearheaded by administrators and information technologists rather
than instructors. This aspect of it provokes criticism from faculty, who
believe that pedagogy should drive technology. Some also stress
the value of face-to-face interaction as a valuable part of the learning process.

Here are some interesting articles that voice these concerns:

David Noble, Digital Diploma Mills: The Automation of Higher Education,
First Monday
, 1998.

Frank White, Digital Diploma Mills: A Dissenting Voice, First Monday, 1999.

Eyal Press and Jennifer Washburn, Digital Diplomas, Mother Jones, 2001.

Digital Asset Management

Digital course materials that support technology-mediated instruction
are important digital assets. They need to be organized, accessed, and
managed. Many of these materials may lend themselves for reuse,
allowing leveraging of these intellectual investments. Current distributed
learning projects, some of which require building extensive databases
or repositories of information, usually focus on present use,
and often lack any procedural or technical provisions for archiving
and retrieving data for future use. The long-term viability of these
critical academic resources needs to be addressed at the early stages
of course development. Faculty will need production and maintenance
guidance to ensure the longevity of these instructional materials
in the face of rapid technological and organizational changes.