| Highlights to note: |
| >> |
The brief discussion of conformance in Section
1.4 provides an important key to implementation. A conforming
implementation: |
| |
— |
will support the model in 2.2. |
| |
— |
will fulfill the responsibilities in 3.1, possibly using
sample mechanisms suggested in Section 3.2. |
| |
Otherwise, the OAIS reference model: |
| |
— |
does not endorse or recommend a specific implementation on
any level, e.g., platform, environment, methodology. |
| |
— |
may provide additional services beyond OAIS required services. |
| |
— |
is a conceptual model for discussion and comparison. |
| >> |
The road map for developing related standards
in Section 1.5 identifies areas that may need to be defined
and coordinated within the OAIS context. |
| >> |
The terminology portion in Section 1.7 and the
definitions of concepts in Section 2 are essential to understanding
and using the OAIS reference model. These provide much
more detailed information than can (or should) be represented
on the high-level reference model and are the official source
for definitions. The diagrams that accompany the concept definitions
often make them much easier to understand. |
| >> |
Section 3 defines the responsibilities of an
OAIS in greater detail. A digital preservation repository
must: |
| |
— |
negotiate for and accepts information |
| |
— |
obtain sufficient control for preservation |
| |
— |
determine the Designated and Consumer Community |
| |
— |
ensure information is independently understandable |
| |
— |
follow established preservation policies and procedures |
| |
— |
make the preserved information available |
| >> |
Section 4 breaks down each high-level function
into parts. For example, Preservation Planning requires one
to: |
| |
— |
monitor the Designated Community |
| |
— |
monitor technology |
| |
— |
develop preservation strategies and standards |
| |
— |
develop packaging designs and migration plans |
| >> |
The functional descriptions define the sub-functions
with essential requirements for each. Section 4.1.2 contains
a dataflow diagram for an OAIS, and Section 4.2 provides
an extensive information model that became the basis for
the preservation metadata work by RLG and OCLC and other
standards development efforts.
|
| >> |
The Preservation Perspective discussion in Section
5.1, Information Preservation, offers subsections on migration
types and processes, and Access Service Preservation,
subsections touch on “look and feel” and emulation. |
| >> |
Section 6 on Archive Interoperability makes some
interesting distinctions between various archives models—independent,
cooperating, and federated archives—and characterizes
levels of autonomy in a subsection on management issues for
federated archives. |
| >> |
The examples of archives in Annex A are interesting
and provide some helpful specifics of implementation work,
but these need to be updated. |
| >> |
The mapping of relationships to other standards
documents the basis for some parts of the reference model
and provides references to additional or relevant documents
and initiatives. It also needs updating. |
| >> |
The Unified Modeling Language (UML) was used
in developing the OAIS model and a number of other
object-based initiatives. Annex C is only a short summary
of UML, but it provides a starting point.
|